GvB: Mr Schultz, allow me to put forward a hypothesis. If the institution of the auction house didn’t exist, I believe it would have to be invented for Bernd Schultz. On one hand, it offers the chance to engage intimately with art. On the other, it provides the perfect opportunity for a Bremen-born merchant to extract money from the pockets of the wealthy. It’s tailor-made for you, isn’t it? Could you ever imagine doing anything else?
BS: I actually had very different career intentions initially. I was hoping to become a private banker. I was lucky enough to experience the wonderful and very well-educated Jewish private banking community. They were interested in art, whether it was music, literature or paintings. Heinrich Grünewald from Poole near Bournemouth once told me a Jewish banker story. An art dealer came to him for advice: “I’d like to buy a painting, a significant Leistikow. But I only have half the money. Can you help me?” He asked, “What’s the price?” “Forty thousand.” “So you want me to lend you twenty thousand?” “Yes.” “Let me tell you something. First, forty thousand is too much. The maximum you should pay is thirty thousand, because the most you’ll get if you sell the painting is forty-five to fifty thousand. If you manage to do that, I’ll be happy to take a half share in the business.” That’s what the bankers of the time were like: well-informed risk takers. Heart-warming! Does that even exist anymore?
GvB: So their spirit and their all-round education are what appealed to you, not just the money associated with the job.
BS: Yes, money is something you have to use creatively. Money in itself is abstract. You can’t drink it, you can’t eat it. You have to do something with it, ideally something practical, of course. I would have enjoyed being a banker. When I left school, at my father’s insistence, I did a two-year apprenticeship at the Lampe Bank in Berlin at its owner Rudolf August Oetker’s recommendation. Rudolf August Oetker had many entrepreneurial talents. He was a passionate private banker with a particular fondness for Berlin, and also an important art collector. I learned a great deal from his wisdom, his ethics, his experience, his understanding of human nature and his remarkable attention to detail – which never failed to surprise us – during the meetings he occasionally allowed me to attend. I observed on those occasions how people were shaped by the many demands of their profession. And then, of course, everything turned out quite differently. Despite the Hanseatic saying that still applies in Bremen today, “he’s no good at business so let him study,” and my father’s attempts to dissuade me, I decided to read business administration and German studies at the Free University of Berlin. Soon after that I enrolled on an art history course, also in Berlin. The city was a stroke of luck for my personal development. Without Berlin, and without the remarkable individuals I met there – many of whom became my teachers and mentors – I would not be the person I am today.
GvB: When and how did you first come into contact with art?
BS: When I was at school. We had an exceptional history and German teacher at Solling boarding school called Helmut Goll. That’s where I learnt what art is and how to “read” it. He lit that first spark of interest in me. My mother also had two reproductions, a dancer by Degas and “Bal du Moulin de la Galette” by Renoir, as well as an illustrated book about the French Impressionists.
GvB: At what age could you tell the difference between a Manet and a Monet?
BS: Much later, but let me come back to your previous question. Because my father refused to fund my studies as a matter of principle, I had to figure out how to support myself. That’s how I ended up as a student trainee with the charismatic antiquarian bookseller and art dealer Hans Pels-Leusden. He pursued me persistently, saying, “I need someone like you.” After thinking it over for a long time, I finally said yes. “You can have that,” he said. “And how much do you expect to earn?” “I need enough to cover my studies and my living costs,” I replied, “So I’d like to earn the same working part-time for you as I did working full-time at the bank, where I was employed as a clerk.” At the time, in 1965, that amounted to 580 deutschmarks. He was taken aback. “You can’t be serious,” he said. But in the end, he agreed. After only a few months, I realised that I had significantly increased the company’s turnover. After a year, I said, “I’ve been with you for twelve months now, the business has almost doubled its turnover, so I think my salary should double as well.” And that became the pattern, year after year. That was my first real taste of success, and I liked working with art and with people.
GvB: Let’s backtrack a little. When you arrived in Berlin in 1963, what was the art scene like, assuming there even was one? What kind of works were being shown at the time?
BS: I was initially much more interested in the antiquarian bookshop scene. My direct involvement with fine art really only began in 1965. That was when Hans Pels-Leusden, who from then on became my employer and mentor, opened his gallery alongside his bookshop and antiquarian business. I had just completed my apprenticeship, and the gallery opened with a major Kollwitz exhibition, which I had helped him to organise. He was an exceptional connoisseur of art but entirely lacking in technical and organisational skills. I took care of all the framing, hanging and installation work – mostly at night. That’s how I found my way into art. Pels-Leusden practically infected me with his stormy enthusiasm. He was a master seducer.
GvB: What kind of art were you both dealing in?
BS: Works by Max Beckmann, Kirchner, Macke, Grosz and so on. In those days, they cost next to nothing, which certainly can’t be said today. The price for a Nolde watercolour was 2,000 deutschmarks.
GvB: Did you buy anything?
BS: A small graphic by Corinth showing cows at a trough. I thought it was portrayed with great sensitivity, because having grown up in a village near Bremen, it captured the world I knew every day, translated into art. I bought the lithograph for 80 deutschmarks, which was a lot of money for me at the time. I paid it off in instalments – ten deutschmarks at a time – and that was how it all began. That’s always how it begins — when you see something that touches your emotions and you just have to own it.
GvB: And then, nearly thirty years later, you took that impulse in a completely different direction by setting up an art fair.
BS: By 1982 people were wondering what role Berlin would play in light of the competition from Munich and the Rhineland – Cologne and Düsseldorf – after its heyday in the 1920s. That was also when Richard von Weizsäcker became mayor of Berlin.
GvB: Suddenly, a light went on. People felt that the city was once again being represented as it truly deserved. Up until then, Berlin had been a desolate place. There were still fascinating intellectuals around, but the city lacked a genuinely exciting art scene.
BS: That's exactly how it was. I was looking for a sounding board for Weizsäcker’s vision and ideas for the city. I got together with several colleagues and convinced them that what we’d done so far wasn’t enough to put Berlin back in the limelight. That’s when I came up with the idea of the ORANGERIE – an art trade exhibition in the eponymous wing of Charlottenburg Palace. The location’s appeal and the concept itself, which was – and still is – unique, played a big role in shaping it.
GvB: What was new about it?
BS: Every art dealer was welcome to exhibit, but not with their usual, often mediocre stock. Instead, each were requested to contribute one, two or three works of exceptional quality. We also wanted to avoid the dealers standing by their objects, trying to sell them. The idea was to create a large exhibition where each work spoke for itself through its presence – a kind of temporary museum show, featuring pieces spanning more than 2,000 years.
GvB: Although it predates it by some years, it sounds a lot like the big art fair in Maastricht.
BS: Yes, we were certainly ambitious. In addition, I’ve always been fortunate to have incredibly experienced, intelligent, educated, and dedicated people supporting me and helping me to turn my ideas into reality.
GvB: And the same was true when you decided to set up an auction house with others. You had realised that Berlin could definitely draw people in – if the right products were being offered. You wanted to take the idea of the ORANGERIE fair, which had been a hit from day one, and turn it into something permanent …
BS: Yes, that's what I wanted. The idea for the auction house began with an encounter I had at the Cologne art fair, where our Pels-Leusden Gallery exhibited annually, alternating with the city of Düsseldorf. Just before the fair Hans Pels-Leusden had managed to acquire one of Emil Nolde’s important “Unpainted Paintings” at the Hauswedell & Nolte auction in Hamburg, winning an open bidding war against a collector I’d never met before. A few weeks later, that same bidder visited our stand. He stared at the painting for a while, then asked me, “How much is it going to cost?” Since we had paid over 50,000 deutschmarks for it about six weeks earlier – fully aware that we were entering a new price bracket for rare works from this period – the 68,000 we were asking at the fair seemed reasonable. I was all the more surprised when the collector replied, “If I’d offered 50,000 for it in Hamburg, it would be mine now.” It was at that moment I realised our traditional business model could no longer work.
GvB: ... because the collectors themselves were already present at the auctions as competitors?
BS: Exactly – that was a dramatically new development. To sell works bought at auction, we had to outbid collectors who were counter-bidders and then attempt to sell the pieces to them with a mark-up. I realised at the time that there was a new transparency, and it has continued to increase ever since. That was the moment I decided to leave the traditional art trade and set up my own auction house – a decision that naturally brought considerable conflict from two sides. On one hand, there was the art trade, whose pricing was becoming increasingly transparent; on the other, the auctioneers, who were determined to protect their previously exclusive position. The greatest resistance came in the form of injunctions and the like from former colleagues. This led to my provocative statement, “Auctions are the modern form of the art trade.” We needed the right venue for our auction house, and in 1982 we came across Villa Grisebach, which was on the market. What followed was something of an odyssey, but in the end, thanks to the unexpected – and truly unique – support of Deutsche Bank, we were able to purchase it. (Alfred Herrhausen once said during a visit: “My dear Mr Schultz, you may not realise it, but the acquisition of Villa Grisebach – badly damaged by the war – along with the neighbouring house, is our bank’s largest patronage commitment since 1945. And it is also the most successful.”)
With that support, we launched the auction house together with four partners. Fortunately our first auctions were not only well received by the press but also profitable.